I MIGHT HAVE BEEN WRONG! TWO-FACE MIGHT BE BACK!!!

Started by DarkVengeance, Mon, 12 Jan 2009, 17:32

Previous topic - Next topic
Quote from: zDBZ on Mon,  1 Jun  2009, 00:36
If Two-Face comes back, it will almost certainly be in the form of flashbacks. I have no interest in seeing the character come back as an alive and active threat, because that would completely kill the conclusion of The Dark Knight IMO. Two-Face needed to die for his story to work in that film, and he should remain dead.
Entirely agreed.

Quote from: The Dark Knight on Mon,  1 Jun  2009, 02:23
Quote from: zDBZ on Mon,  1 Jun  2009, 00:36
If Two-Face comes back, it will almost certainly be in the form of flashbacks. I have no interest in seeing the character come back as an alive and active threat, because that would completely kill the conclusion of The Dark Knight IMO. Two-Face needed to die for his story to work in that film, and he should remain dead.
Entirely agreed.

Same here.
-------------------------------------------------------------
"Do you like eating in here?"   ...Oh yeah. .. ....   ... ... ...You know to tell you the truth, I don't think I've ever been in this room before.   
"hahaeheheh"  You want to get out of here?  "YES."

Quote from: Batnar on Mon,  1 Jun  2009, 03:16
Quote from: The Dark Knight on Mon,  1 Jun  2009, 02:23
Quote from: zDBZ on Mon,  1 Jun  2009, 00:36
If Two-Face comes back, it will almost certainly be in the form of flashbacks. I have no interest in seeing the character come back as an alive and active threat, because that would completely kill the conclusion of The Dark Knight IMO. Two-Face needed to die for his story to work in that film, and he should remain dead.

Entirely agreed.

Same here.

I guess it's better than not having him play a role at all....

What if the ending of The Dark Knight isn't what it seems, and things change in the new film? Even so, with the ending, Harvey doesn't have to be dead for the side-plot of Batman being the bad guy to work. Maybe they will try some of the really twisted, dark Two-Face stories. Maybe restore his face and then have him snap again and scar it himself.

I could also totally just envision a shot of Harvey from the back and then him turning around in a cell in Arkham or something.

Quote from: Batmoney on Mon,  1 Jun  2009, 05:00
What if the ending of The Dark Knight isn't what it seems, and things change in the new film? Even so, with the ending, Harvey doesn't have to be dead for the side-plot of Batman being the bad guy to work. Maybe they will try some of the really twisted, dark Two-Face stories. Maybe restore his face and then have him snap again and scar it himself.

I could also totally just envision a shot of Harvey from the back and then him turning around in a cell in Arkham or something.

Yep, I totally agree.



Quote from: Batmoney on Mon,  1 Jun  2009, 05:00
What if the ending of The Dark Knight isn't what it seems, and things change in the new film? Even so, with the ending, Harvey doesn't have to be dead for the side-plot of Batman being the bad guy to work. Maybe they will try some of the really twisted, dark Two-Face stories. Maybe restore his face and then have him snap again and scar it himself.

I could also totally just envision a shot of Harvey from the back and then him turning around in a cell in Arkham or something.
Except that the script for The Dark Knight explicitly states that Harvey dies from that fall.

If he were to somehow survive and return in the third film, then that film would have to spend a good chunk of time explaining how he survived and what Gordon and Batman did to cover up what happened, at the expense of the story for that particular movie.

Two-Face is in my Top 3 as far as Batman villains go, and I'd love to see him on film again. But in this series, it needs to be in the form of flashbacks to avoid ruining the arc that Harvey went through in The Dark Knight.

Tue, 2 Jun 2009, 00:56 #38 Last Edit: Tue, 2 Jun 2009, 01:00 by Batnar
This is why i don't read comics nor follow movie plots ever again.  :( It's all crap. Writers that can't make up their minds. And or succumb to the laws of money making and not the original concept to begin with. Makes it even more fake to allow my emotions to tap in respectfully and follow. Hence why I totally slept through TDK after 10 minutes into it, the second time i went to see it with friends.  

I'm currently writing a story for a future official release. If a character dies in my book, you can sure bet he wont be coming back. DEAD IS DEAD. If they don't want to kill a character off, they shouldn't do it in the first place. That's why when someone dies, even in an obvious body dismembering explosion, I can't help but think... maybe he/she survived it?? lol... That's crap.

This is what I call "the boy who cried wolf syndrome".  These guys keep screwing with us with twists and turns, and finally, I no longer care if Batman himself dies. He'll be back in some form. So there's really no danger element anymore. Point a gun at a person's head, who cares?! He/she will be back in part 2 anyways or perhaps part 3.


blagh...  :P

If Harvey comes back, TDK is spoiled for me.  

Part of what made the ending so strong in TDK, was Harvey's death.

...Sides... if he didn't die from that fall, surely his bacteria infested half of his face should do him in within a couple of days of hardcore infection. I mean seriously... lol.
-------------------------------------------------------------
"Do you like eating in here?"   ...Oh yeah. .. ....   ... ... ...You know to tell you the truth, I don't think I've ever been in this room before.   
"hahaeheheh"  You want to get out of here?  "YES."

Harvey was handled all wrong anyway he was introduced,turned and killed far too fast it should have been a slow burn to insanity after his accident not wakingup one day and being persuaded by a serial killer that it was gotham/batman/gordons fault which made no real sense to me.