Wonder Woman (2017)

Started by The Joker, Wed, 25 Nov 2015, 16:23

Previous topic - Next topic
She was 30 on the nose when she filmed the first Wonder Woman film. She looked 25.

To put it delicately, Gadot, um, doesn't exactly look 25 anymore these days. Hell, she doesn't even look 30, frankly.

Now, I like her portrayal of Wonder Woman as much as the next guy. But are we supposed to pretend like we're surprised that a ~40 year old woman has been disqualified from playing the character? Even if WW84 had been a masterpiece (which it wasn't), there would still be a VERY strong argument that Gadot has just plain aged out of playing an immortal/eternally young character.

On a more practical level, I just love Connie Nielsen's girl math. "Herpa derpa the first one made $800 million!" Apparently, the second one making (at best) -$30 million shouldn't matter to anyone.

Batman & Robin brought the franchise to a screeching halt... even tho it technically turned some kind profit at the box office. Nobody calls WB's decision to close out the old franchise and reboot with a new one a narcissistic business decision. On the contrary, their decision to do so is generally considered to be one of the greatest masterstrokes in the history of cinema.


With Gal, I think she could have easily pulled off a Wonder Woman 3 with minimum fuss. Shazam 2 came out, when? Last year? Gal had a small cameo in that, and I don't know? She looked pretty good to me. Course, when you have a amplitude of positive goodwill from the GA/fans (which I think Gal has with the role), they are more willing to overlook a lot in suspending disbelief just to see the actor reprise the role again and again.

Unfortunately, CBM's are not the sure-thing hit nowadays, and there's just no appetite for a WW3. Audiences are just not going to show up for nearly anything Superhero related like they did in the past, and sequels to billion dollar films can very easily fall flat on their face at the box office. Since 2019, outside of some very select outliers, it's pretty much been a series of diminishing returns...
"Imagination is a quality given a man to compensate him for what he is not, and a sense of humour was provided to console him for what he is."

QuoteThe highly anticipated Wonder Woman has faced a lot of development challenges and the big rumor of late is that Warner Bros. Games started over last year with a fresh with a new direction. The project underwent a complete reboot in early 2024 and received a new director, despite already accumulating over $100 million in development costs.

The game, which was announced three years ago and promised to deliver a single-player, open-world experience, has struggled to meet its creative goals. Monolith Productions, known for their work on Middle-earth: Shadow of War, leads the development of this ambitious project.

Gaming industry experts estimate the release is still several years away. The substantial investment and recent leadership changes signal Warner Bros. Games' commitment to getting the Wonder Woman adaptation right, though questions remain about the project's future.

https://9meters.com/entertainment/games/the-troubled-wonder-woman-game-was-rebooted-in-early-2024-with-a-new-director-after-warner-bros-games-reportedly-spent-over-100-million

The article even mentioned that cancellation for the game is still a possibility. They probably overhauled the game to make it a Games-as-a-service product because they were expecting that awful Suicide Squad game to be a hit. Morons.

I know this has nothing to do with Wonder Woman on film, but once again, it's another example of WB screwing up Wonder Woman and DC in general.
QuoteJonathan Nolan: He [Batman] has this one rule, as the Joker says in The Dark Knight. But he does wind up breaking it. Does he break it in the third film?

Christopher Nolan: He breaks it in...

Jonathan Nolan: ...the first two.

Source: http://books.google.com.au/books?id=uwV8rddtKRgC&pg=PR8&dq=But+he+does+wind+up+breaking+it.&hl=en&sa=X&ei