Batman: Year Two

[Slash Man]

Just read this one for the first time via the DC Finest line. It's always been one of those famous stories that's persisted over the years, but fallen short of indisputable classic. It's better regarded as a sequel than The Dark Knight Strikes Again, at least, but another case of the original story being so beloved that it's nearly impossible to follow up on.

To start on what works: Alan Davis' art is immaculate, and the cover to Detective Comics #575 is one that immediately ropes you in. Unfortunately, changing artists along the way hurts the experience, especially with this being another story intended to be read as a graphic novel. While I don't think McFarlane's style is particularly suited for Batman, this does offer a unique entry for the artist. I find Alfredo Alcala's inks help reign in the style back to Batman.

The story presents a lot of good ideas that aren't taken far enough. Another issue might have given the story some time to breathe. The main villain, The Reaper is a compelling one. It's a nice bit of world-building to know that he was briefly Gotham's first vigilante, even if it is already a trope that Batman comes into conflict with vigilantes that hunt the same criminals, but kill them.

The biggest issue is how out of character Batman acts. The excuse can be given that this is still early in his career, but he gets his ass kicked once and then picks up a gun? He never really uses it in any meaningful way, since he's still not committed to taking a life. And the times that he does use it, you could easily substitute it for a batarang. Teaming up with Joe Chill and allowing him to kill people along the way, seems like a mistake.

The love interest also very forgettable. It seemed like Bruce just flirting with every girl he meets, but apparently he's serious enough about this girl to dissuade her from becoming a nun?

[The Dark Knight]

I'd need to read the story again but I don't like the way the ideas were presented. I can buy Batman deciding to use Venom in his early years to compensate for a lack of strength in saving people. I don't have a problem with Batman being more ferocious in combat, or simply defending himself and manslaughter happens as a result. But holstering a gun?

I like what Batman Beyond does with firearms, with their possible use being a very last resort when Batman is vulnerable and at risk of serious damage. But even then it's something he hates doing. Take away the 'no guns' argument for a second, it's also an admission he's not intimidating enough or physically capable without them. He's disgusted with himself and decides to retire.