Is There a Plausible Way to Tie 'Batman Returns' to 'Batman Forever'?

Started by Burtonite_08, Sat, 12 Jul 2008, 14:35

Previous topic - Next topic
Forever, to me, is like a reboot of the Batman film franchise. As for B & R, it seems like its own thing b/c Batman Forever, while it had zaniness, still had dark & serious moments, but B & R was basically just a campfest. I mean sure it tried to get at your heart at certain times (Alfred's sickness for ex.), but those scenes just don't save it. With that in mind, it's pretty hard to connect Forever w/ B & R.


I kinda get what you are saying.

Batman Forever is indeed a much darker film, especially compared to that of Batman & Robin. I suppose the addition of returning cast members, Two-Face and Riddler's getups being shown as a wink to the audience, and of course the neon are the main dots that connect BF to B&R.
"Imagination is a quality given a man to compensate him for what he is not, and a sense of humour was provided to console him for what he is."


In alot of ways, I can see how each Batman film (excluding the Nolan films), could be seen as loose sequels, and not direct sequels. Theres not a ton of things linking Batman 1989 to Batman Returns, even BR's Gotham looked alot different than in 1989. Which obviously continued with 1995's Batman Forever.

"Imagination is a quality given a man to compensate him for what he is not, and a sense of humour was provided to console him for what he is."

I like to think of Gotham City in BR as a different place in Gotham, In B89 we got the town hall, Flugelheim Museum, main stree, crim alley etc., while in Returns we got the Plaza, Shreck building, Penguins office, Penguin's Lair etc.

The reason why Gotham looks different in Returns is b/c it was meant to resemble New York City's cleanup in the 90's (I believe), whereas the BATMAN Gotham was meant to resemble NYC in its dirty times (70's-80's from what I've read). Returns Gotham was also made to look whimsical b/c the movie took place during the holiday season. Besides what I've mentioned above, you do know that both films had different designers, right?

Forever's Gotham City in the day looks like Metropolis, Las Vegas & Tokyo at night. B & R's Gotham, in the words of Gotham Knight, was just a drug trip. I mean, there were even more unnecessary features, like gigantic statues of Greek Gods for example. Funny thing is, Barbara Ling designed these sets in both films.

I always thought Forever looks more like the present day Times Square.

Quote from: batass4880 on Wed, 28 Jan  2009, 23:16
I always thought Forever looks more like the present day Times Square.

Times Square has lights, but it doesn't have the overdone neon that the Schumacher films have. From what I've seen & read, this Gotham is based on Las Vegas & Tokyo.


Are you talking about the scene where Bruce visits Meridian Raleagh?