Messages

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gQKt4jnr-A&feature=g-all-u

This guy is doing a "decampified version" of Batman Forever, and he is having a small problem with doing it.  He is using the program audacity to help with the audio. The problem is he needs help with removing background noise from the clips. He just wants to remove the voices he don't want in the recut of batman forever. Thx 

A true sequel to Batman returns.... essentially a remake of Batman Forever....

I'm just been wondering, cuz I heard it is really good. Does anyone have this?

http://fanedit.org/315/

It sure looks like it. Look at the neon in the background.

I would like reasons please. 

Who voted for Forever?

I think the scene where Bruce Wayne tells Chase about his parent's murder would have fit Keaton well, too..

I gonnasta go with Returns. It's a masterpiece, and it's an unique film, and I think films of this kind aren't just made anymore. It's a homage to the older-films of the  40s. This is what makes Returns so special.

Forever, on the other hand, is more of a comic-bookish film. It's prone to a couple  moments of camp, and the film suffers because of it. Had the film had been a bit darker, the film would of been better for the good. As it stands, it's a good, but not great film about Batman.

I can see why some people don't like Returns, and I can see why some people don't like Forever. They are very much"Love It-or Hate It" films.

They(Warner) were willing give Keaton 35 million to do this film. Any qualms that Keaton had were going to be heard indefinitely, because the powerful influence he exerted.  If Keaton wanted his batman to be darker, no doubt in my mind, Warner would let him do his thing.

He has the darkness down. He, I think, understands the character. This is why Kane thought he was the best Batman because he played Batman and understood the character while playing Bats.