Has anybody seen this? A Closer Look: Batman Returns' Impact on Children (July 1992)
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: The Laughing Fish on Sat, 17 Sep 2016, 01:42Quote from: arnaud187 on Thu, 15 Sep 2016, 19:04
Agreed, the dialogue is goofy, but then the practically all of the rest of the movie's dialogue is a joke anyway.
To be fair, the dialogue in all the Alfred-Bruce scenes weren't too shabby.
Quote from: Wayne49 on Mon, 9 Nov 2015, 13:03
I think it's pretty easy to see why they picked Schumacher to direct this series. When you look at movies like Lost Boys and Flat-liners, you can see his knack for bringing mood to film through visual elements. The fact they were dark doesn't really mean anything outside of the fact the director demonstrated he could successfully instill a prescribed mood to those projects. The studio was most likely looking for a director that understood how to inject that component and operate in the world of Batman. That being said, there were allot of cooks in the kitchen for this film. That is abundantly clear when you compare with B&R.
In many ways, Forever is a very restrained film. If there is a tonal meter you could dial into this film, there are moments when the studio has Schumacher pull out all the stops, then Burton quickly interjects and starts reeling him (and the studio) back on the tracks towards a darker mood. It's a very measured film in terms of conveying a tone. That mood needle never sits on just one treatment for very long. B&R is decidedly one direction and never really lets off the gas except for a few obligatory moments with Alfred as the sympathetic character in trouble. So you can definitely tell there were allot of people pulling the strings in Forever.