http://filmonic.com/batman-reboot-already-planned-at-warner-bros
To be honest I have a problem with this, I like Nolan and enjoy what he has done with the franchise but my personal feeling ist that after TDKR, let Batman lie for a while, concentrate on some of the other DC characters and then get at it again in a few years time. I was thinking of The Dark KNight Returns movie or a Batman Beyond movie or even an Elseworlds type film. To reboot it again, especially if it's from the start, doesn't make much sense to me.
What do you guys think?
I'm not sure if a reboot is required. I'm all for a re-imagining though!
But, take the approach Batman89 and Forever did...reference his origins. All the best comics do it, IMO. It gives the character motive and reminds the audience of his overall mission.
That's all a new approach needs.
Batman should already exist, his villians should already exist. We should be visiting Gotham and all it's woes...we don't need to see them introduced again.
Saw this coming. Reboots happen at the drop of a dime. Is it a terrible idea. Yes. It's even worse news for Nolan's work, because whether they are connected or not it will cause a cheapening of the entire franchise in one stroke because honestly, 8 movies? Look I know everybody likes to wave James Bond as prove positive that it can work. But, lets stop lying to ourselves, that string of movies is so stale I'm surprised that James doesn't walk around with patches of green and blue mold on him. James Bond is cheap entertainment. Do we really want the same for Batman. Even worse, Nolan's films have a rabid fan-base that will A) divide between TDK and TDKR, turn its poison on itself, and start slitting their own throats this time, and B) feverishly deny that, by all accounts, this THIRD feature will, like all other comic book attempts at 3, will be disastrous, and by no small fault of The Dark Knight's psychotic over hype.
The reboot will in fact accelerate Nolan's movies move into relative obscurity, when it's revealed that a large portion of TDK's fan base is in fact band wagon hoppers taken in by TDK's over exposure, who will immediately jump to the next fad, leaving TDK fanboys to moan and shout at the wind, like a homeless street preacher waving his bible, forecasting the apocalypse, as the maelstrom passes him by and shakes it's head.
Yes its true, since 2008 TDK's fanboys were and are the equivalent of a powerful political party, able to force its views on the public by simply having enough of a fringe base that could pass misinformation off as truth to support it's elected leader. And they have already organized and flooded the airwaves with their counter offensive against the upcoming candidate, which will ultimately fail because they have forgotten that the people really don't dictate what's produced, Warner Brothers does, and they see money, money, money. CHEAP money. Money makes the world go around..that clinking clanking sound.
It's the Malcolm effect.
*Fist pump*
I hoped this would happen. I'm all for scrapping realism. Get rid of it. Bring back Burton-esque expressionism and fantasy. I will not relent with that stance. That is my preferred take on the character. When you're at war, you kick the enemy when they're down.
Nolan lovers will have more than just Burton to compare to. Everything that is new is always the 'best'. Let them go crazy with TDKR. Because after that, the years will pass and everyone will be on board with the new direction. Nolan is not above Batman. The Nolan nuts will soon realize they are not the be-all and end-all. They are just another cog in the wheel. A drop in the ocean. Just as BTAS had it's time in the sun. And now it's all about The Brave and the Bold. Etc, etc.
Quote from: Paul (ral) on Thu, 31 Mar 2011, 17:32
But, take the approach Batman89 and Forever did...reference his origins. All the best comics do it, IMO. It gives the character motive and reminds the audience of his overall mission.
That's all a new approach needs.
Batman should already exist, his villians should already exist. We should be visiting Gotham and all it's woes...we don't need to see them introduced again.
Agree 100%
Read this earlier in the week, and I couldn't be happier, seriously, to me Nolan's films are nothing more than 'meh'. I'd like it to be like 89 and like someone else said, reference his origins, and start out the film with Batman as Batman. Plus with CGI at its peak, I'd love to see the more supernatural villians (ClayFace, Croc, Freeze, ect.).
Quote from: Seantastic on Fri, 1 Apr 2011, 08:36
I'd like it to be like 89 and like someone else said, reference his origins, and start out the film with Batman as Batman. Plus with CGI at its peak, I'd love to see the more supernatural villians (ClayFace, Croc, Freeze, ect.).
Absolutely. We've reached a point where origin stories are not needed IMO. Especially with Batman. Batman Begins serves all of the films, even if it's in a different universe. It's the same overall result. And we've had Batman and Joker meeting for the first time twice. That is not needed for a third time. Throw us right into the world of an established Batman. With
all of the rogues gallery already established, and have been for quite some time. Case in point, how BF dealt with their Two-Face. At most, a brief snippet of his past in some fashion, ala the news reel. Just give us straight up adventures in a place where time does not exist.
Quote from: The Dark Knight on Fri, 1 Apr 2011, 08:50
Quote from: Seantastic on Fri, 1 Apr 2011, 08:36
I'd like it to be like 89 and like someone else said, reference his origins, and start out the film with Batman as Batman. Plus with CGI at its peak, I'd love to see the more supernatural villians (ClayFace, Croc, Freeze, ect.).
Absolutely. We've reached a point where origin stories are not needed IMO. Especially with Batman. Batman Begins serves all of the films, even if it's in a different universe. It's the same overall result. And we've had Batman and Joker meeting for the first time twice. That is not needed for a third time. Throw us right into the world of an established Batman. With all of the rogues gallery already established, and have been for quite some time. Case in point, how BF dealt with their Two-Face. At most, a brief snippet of his past in some fashion, ala the news reel. Just give us straight up adventures in a place where time does not exist.
I don't know about them all, but I would like some to be created, kinda like how they did Clayface in The Batman Season 1, I want to see a villian be set up for the next film.
Quote from: The Dark Knight on Fri, 1 Apr 2011, 04:39
*Fist pump*
I hoped this would happen. I'm all for scrapping realism. Get rid of it. Bring back Burton-esque expressionism and fantasy. I will not relent with that stance. That is my preferred take on the character. When you're at war, you kick the enemy when they're down.
Nolan lovers will have more than just Burton to compare to. Everything that is new is always the 'best'. Let them go crazy with TDKR. Because after that, the years will pass and everyone will be on board with the new direction. Nolan is not above Batman. The Nolan nuts will soon realize they are not the be-all and end-all. They are just another cog in the wheel. A drop in the ocean. Just as BTAS had it's time in the sun. And now it's all about The Brave and the Bold. Etc, etc.
I'm with you on this one Dark Knight. As long as Warners hires a decent A-list director for a future 'reboot' who takes the requisite time to develop the best possible movie, rather than just simply rushing a new franchise into release simply to fill the studio's annual summer tentpole slot, I'm all for it.
I love Nolan's Batman movies, I really love Burton's Batman movies (that's why I'm here of course), I like bits of the 60s tv series and although I'm not a massive fan, I even have some respect for Schumacher's vision, if not the execution of his respective Batman-films, but there's plenty of scope for another version of the character. I would preferably like to see a live-action Batman series that pays some homage to B:TAS, with a heightened art-deco-style Gotham, a larger-than-life, distinctively stylised but non-campy 'rogue gallery', and a willingness to embrace some of the more fantastical, supernatural/science-fiction-type characters like Poison Ivy, Mr Freeze, and even Man-Bat and Clayface.
I agree with Ral that there is no real need to re-explore Batman's origins again, at least not for a long while. Instead, I would like to see stand-alone movies that deal with the grand scheme of one, or two villains who easily compliment one-another (i.e. The Joker and Harley Quinn), with a precise plot that has a beginning, middle and end. Ideally, I'd like to see Harley Quinn as the lead villain in a new movie, with an incarcerated Joker pulling the strings from Arkham Asylum. By limiting The Joker's screen-time in favour of his 'puppet' in the outside-world, Harley Quinn, the filmmakers can avoid any the inevitable attempts by certain fans to compare the new Joker unfavourably to Heath Ledger's performance.
Quote from: The Dark Knight on Fri, 1 Apr 2011, 08:50
Quote from: Seantastic on Fri, 1 Apr 2011, 08:36
I'd like it to be like 89 and like someone else said, reference his origins, and start out the film with Batman as Batman. Plus with CGI at its peak, I'd love to see the more supernatural villians (ClayFace, Croc, Freeze, ect.).
Absolutely. We've reached a point where origin stories are not needed IMO. Especially with Batman. Batman Begins serves all of the films, even if it's in a different universe. It's the same overall result. And we've had Batman and Joker meeting for the first time twice. That is not needed for a third time. Throw us right into the world of an established Batman. With all of the rogues gallery already established, and have been for quite some time. Case in point, how BF dealt with their Two-Face. At most, a brief snippet of his past in some fashion, ala the news reel. Just give us straight up adventures in a place where time does not exist.
I agree with almost everything, but maybe some villains might work best if they have a complete arc with an origin story. But I agree 100% that they shouldn't retell the origin. Present an already established Batman in his mid-to-late 30s, and that's all.
What really annoys me is the arrogance that everyone must follow Nolan's way. As if it's the definitive blueprint for everything. To have everything "real" from now on. Batman is all about change and variety. Showing the character in different lights. How insulting would it be to demand a director to direct like somebody else.
Everybody has their own style, and that should be embraced. Because that's why they would be hired in the first place. I am not interested in somebody doing a Nolan impersonation. If they want to do that, hire Nolan again. Burton did it his way. Schumacher did it his. The sheer one eyed delusion that Batman cannot be handled any other way gets to me. Even if it's a reboot where the impossible is possible, it's shouted down because it's "goofy". Yet they read the comics and accept it there.
Regarding the villains, I think it's time for something different. Of course only certain characters will appear in the story you want to tell. And when the others do, they have little background to them. I mean, if it's a flashforward in time, the characters have already been through that discovery phase. They know. And we all know as well. I'm not asking for *every* villain to appear in each film.
Some great discussions there and to be honest I WOULD like to see a more Burton Batman if you will, more along the lines of Batman '89 and Batman Returns and even, as someone said, more supernatural/fantasy type villains. My main concern is Nolan overlooking this reboot, even if they go more fantasy, Nolan might still want that hard edged seriousness, that expository type dialogue etc.
I like Nolan, I think he's a great filmmaker, but stay away from the franchise, even just for a while. ;)
I read and watched an interview with Bruce Timm saying Batman Year One will be the next DC Direct Animated Movie.
Anyone know anything about the cast????
Quote from: colobat65 on Tue, 5 Apr 2011, 22:27
I read and watched an interview with Bruce Timm saying Batman Year One will be the next DC Direct Animated Movie.
Anyone know anything about the cast????
I didn't even know they were planning this! I hope they pull it off, they're DTV track record is rather hit and miss.
As far as a Batman reboot, I don't want one. As "stale"(matter of opinion) as the Bond franchise has become, I would rather they go that route. Each director of the Bond films bring their own style to the one they are working on, yet it is within the same continuity (Casino Royale is the only exception). You CAN apply this to Batman, and it would guaranty that any and all aspects of Batman would and could be represented within the series, much like a different writer and artist bringing their own stamp to the comics.
I'm confused. Is this guy a spammer trying to sell stuff or is he a truly disturbed individual who speaks only in Nike analogies?
Boy, he could be the lamest Batvillain ever! ;D
Quote from: GBglide on Mon, 2 May 2011, 09:40
I'm confused. Is this guy a spammer trying to sell stuff or is he a truly disturbed individual who speaks only in Nike analogies?
Boy, he could be the lamest Batvillain ever! ;D
Yeah, some sort of weird spam thing. it's gone now.
I'm with Dark Knight. Time to reboot after TDKR. I want a more fantasy Batman film where we can get more of the comic book villains than the constraints Nolan has.
Quote from: Doc Sock on Mon, 23 May 2011, 21:45
I'm with Dark Knight.
Good. You're either with me or against me. ;)
A great new foray into the bats' universe could be a decent into the mist...
Vampires are real...but not all of them are evil. (Or frosty haired metrosexuals.)
Quote from: Gotham Knight on Tue, 24 May 2011, 15:55
A great new foray into the bats' universe could be a decent into the mist...
Vampires are real...but not all of them are evil. (Or frosty haired metrosexuals.)
or associated with crap like the-mormon-books-turned-into-movies-that-shall-not-be-named.
The Burton series has run its course, but a similar series would be great. The Nolan films were great action flicks, but the Burton films have a more classic feel to them. Of course, Batman '89 seems like it could exist anytime, wheras the super-realistic Nolan films are only current. Hopefully, they can make something original, that hasn't been done before. I take it they want it to be a long series, so just start Batman in the middle of his adventures, and let the comic stories unfold.
Quote from: Slash Man on Sun, 26 Jun 2011, 06:25
Of course, Batman '89 seems like it could exist anytime, wheras the super-realistic Nolan films are only current.
Exactly.
Welcome to the site.
Thanks, it's nice to have a place where people can appreciate the work of Burton's films. His influence (on comic book movies in general) is greatly underrated.
This seems like as good a place as any to make my first post here. I'm good friends with BatmAngelus, who convinced me that I should sign up. A lifetime ago, I was an active poster at Batman-on-Film. Since I left, I've been making occasional posts at the anarchic mess that is SHH. I'm not what you would call a Burtonite. I hold '89 in very high esteem, but it's not without flaws and I do hate Returns more than I hate TDK. In general, I'm a comics fan first and foremost, and it bothers me when any Batflick feels more like a Burton film or a Nolan film than a BATMAN film. Still, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Nolan's cult of personality gets in the way of meaningful discussion, so I'm just looking for a place where that mindset isn't prevalent.
Now, to the topic at hand. I've been pining for a "reboot" since the stink of TDK first became apparent. Like '89, Begins was an excellent Batman film that suffered from a few minor welts. It dealt with the origin in a satisfactory manner, so I have no real desire to see a strict origin film for the foreseeable future. That said, the death of Bruce's parents should always cast a shadow and the most organic way to revisit the issue is to tell the origin story of Dick Grayson. The first film in the new cycle could use Dark Victory for its thematic inspiration, and we could rewrite the rules of the franchise without having to focus another film on Bruce's first days in the cowl. My top two choices to direct are David Fincher and Alfonso Cuarón. I'd also love to see Guillermo del Toro direct a one-shot with Man-Bat as the villain.
Welcome to the site, McAllister! It's always good to have more comic fans around. And any friend of BatmAngelus is sure to know his stuff.
As far as the reboot goes, I wouldn't object to the new series beginning in media res. One of the things I find slightly off-putting about the Superman reboot is its purported focus on the Man of Steel's origins. We've already seen Superman's origin three times in the past twenty years (L&C, S:TAS and Smallville) and I don't really want to see yet another retelling so soon. I'd rather they just jumped in at the deep end with Superman already established.
Focusing on Robin's origins instead of Bruce's seems like a logical compromise for the Batman franchise. It would start the new series off at an accessible juncture without retreading ground that's been recently explored.
I want a reboot. Take Batman out of the Nolan/realistic world.
Batman doesnt live in Chicago and then moves to Pittburgh.
I wonder what Snyder and Nolan will do to Metropolis in Man of Steel. Will it be a fantasy/CGI city ot just New York City like the previous films.
Quote from: McAllister on Wed, 10 Aug 2011, 18:50the death of Bruce's parents should always cast a shado
I wholeheartedly agree. To me it's Batman's main motivation...it should still be on his mind and the films should show that...the best comics do (IMO)
Welcome to the site!
I want an in media res Batman as well. As for who? Christopher Meloni. He's the only modern actor I can think of that evokes the character.
Michael Uslan was recently asked about the future of the Batman franchise, post-Nolan:
http://www.movieweb.com/news/exclusive-batman-and-robin-movie-may-be-next-from-dc-comics-new-52
Quote"The only thing I would direct your attention to is the new comic books. The comic books have kept this character vital, and intriguing, for seventy-two years. We are all still going back every Wednesday to see what's new. I think the character is that vital and that sustaining. He is going to be around for a long time to come."
Now, the thing is, Movieweb somehow believes that Uslan is hinting that the next Batman film may be based on the rebooted comic book title, Batman and Robin, with Bruce Wayne's Batman fighting crime with his son, Damian, as Robin.
Problem is
where the heck does Uslan ever hint about this? What's in his words that even implies that specific title? And isn't Uslan just saying that the character is always changing in the comics?
Recently, Batman Online posted this on its Facebook wall:
QuoteWord on the street is Taylor Kitsch could be in the running to take over as Batman?
Where did we hear this?
Personally, I don't believe it nor do I want it to happen. The guy's had a terrible year box office-wise, with John Carter, Battleship, and Savages, so I have my doubts WB is considering him to headline a big franchise. Kitsch himself swore off returning to Gambit, so I don't think he'd elect to don the Batman costume: http://www.comicbookmovie.com/john_carter_of_mars/news/?a=55241
Then again, considering the reception to his movies, perhaps he and his reps have changed their mind and think playing a known superhero would help his career.
Still, I've had to watch John Carter several times for work-related reasons and I just don't think he'd cut it.
Moviehole made mention of it.
Personally I don't think we will get any announcements for at least a year.
I think the Nolan films are going to seriously outdated in 20 years. Burton films are a work of art, set in a new world of a cross between the 90's and 40's, which makes it seem timeless and classic. Dark City film had the same approach which also makes it seem timeless. Nolan films are being worshiped by this new generation of Batman fans, but since that incarnation of Batman is dead, it looks as if a reboot is the right way to go to focus on a different version of the character, hopefully more of the one from the comic or 1992 animated series!
Quote from: Batman333 on Mon, 13 Aug 2012, 04:39
I think the Nolan films are going to seriously outdated in 20 years. Burton films are a work of art, set in a new world of a cross between the 90's and 40's, which makes it seem timeless and classic. Dark City film had the same approach which also makes it seem timeless. Nolan films are being worshiped by this new generation of Batman fans, but since that incarnation of Batman is dead, it looks as if a reboot is the right way to go to focus on a different version of the character, hopefully more of the one from the comic or 1992 animated series!
I can't imagine people wanting to sit through the dark knight rises too many times sitting for 3 hours and having maybe 30 minutes worth of enjoyable scenes which can be enjoyed over and over. I've already gone through in my mind how I'd feel seeing it a second time: the scene in which he finally dons the cape and cowl again as entertaining and would be nice to see again but I'd be bored senseless. The burton films on the other hand and even the first Schumacher film are actually FUN and can be enjoyed again and again.
I agree the 89-BR universe transcends a specific date, where as Nolen's feel very "now".
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: Paul (ral) on Sat, 11 Aug 2012, 19:27Moviehole made mention of it.
Personally I don't think we will get any announcements for at least a year.
This. And partly because WB is still promoting TDKRises. It'd be completely illogical (if honest) to say the movie out right now is basically going to be obsolete in just a few short years. Besides, without a director to lead the reboot, WB may not even have much of a plan themselves.
given that it was 4 years between the dark knight and the dark knight rises you'd think there'd be at least that long of an interval between the next film in a different continuity. Potential justice league film notwithstanding.
(https://www.batman-online.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.comicbookmovie.com%2Fimages%2Fusers%2Fuploads%2F20928%2FScott%2520Adkins%252024-tile-tile-tile-tile.jpg&hash=2d7be0b3a160b13a020b96782b9855d9ed117509)
He has the looks, physique, very impressive martial arts skills and he can act. He could be perfect as the new Batman. What do you guys think ?
Quote from: Gotham Knight on Thu, 31 Mar 2011, 17:39
Saw this coming. Reboots happen at the drop of a dime. Is it a terrible idea. Yes. It's even worse news for Nolan's work, because whether they are connected or not it will cause a cheapening of the entire franchise in one stroke because honestly, 8 movies? Look I know everybody likes to wave James Bond as prove positive that it can work. But, lets stop lying to ourselves, that string of movies is so stale I'm surprised that James doesn't walk around with patches of green and blue mold on him. James Bond is cheap entertainment. Do we really want the same for Batman. Even worse, Nolan's films have a rabid fan-base that will A) divide between TDK and TDKR, turn its poison on itself, and start slitting their own throats this time, and B) feverishly deny that, by all accounts, this THIRD feature will, like all other comic book attempts at 3, will be disastrous, and by no small fault of The Dark Knight's psychotic over hype.
The reboot will in fact accelerate Nolan's movies move into relative obscurity, when it's revealed that a large portion of TDK's fan base is in fact band wagon hoppers taken in by TDK's over exposure, who will immediately jump to the next fad, leaving TDK fanboys to moan and shout at the wind, like a homeless street preacher waving his bible, forecasting the apocalypse, as the maelstrom passes him by and shakes it's head.
Yes its true, since 2008 TDK's fanboys were and are the equivalent of a powerful political party, able to force its views on the public by simply having enough of a fringe base that could pass misinformation off as truth to support it's elected leader. And they have already organized and flooded the airwaves with their counter offensive against the upcoming candidate, which will ultimately fail because they have forgotten that the people really don't dictate what's produced, Warner Brothers does, and they see money, money, money. CHEAP money. Money makes the world go around..that clinking clanking sound.
It's the Malcolm effect.
Im all for Nolan fanboys killing themselves, personally.
Quote from: Grissom on Thu, 31 Mar 2011, 16:16
http://filmonic.com/batman-reboot-already-planned-at-warner-bros
To be honest I have a problem with this, I like Nolan and enjoy what he has done with the franchise but my personal feeling ist that after TDKR, let Batman lie for a while, concentrate on some of the other DC characters and then get at it again in a few years time. I was thinking of The Dark KNight Returns movie or a Batman Beyond movie or even an Elseworlds type film. To reboot it again, especially if it's from the start, doesn't make much sense to me.
What do you guys think?
To tell you my personal opinion I'm all for this. I'm totally against seeing a new Batman introduced in a Justic League film however. I think that's a really stupid idea after the genius of Bale's era. It's a good (ergo bad) means of alienating the fans and viewers of the Dark Knight trilogy to suddenly have this new boy pop up in a team up flick. Establish him first, then do a team up (if we really must *sigh*).
I agree with resting Batman certainly (even Chris O' Donnel said this is an important means to the success of the series). When it does return however I want something completely different. I've had my fill of Bat realism. Actually I'm afraid about the idea of us never ever getting rid of the realism stuff Nolan brought. I want to see dynamic Batwing's and Batmobile's again and the return of the cool (and yet impractical) yellow chest oval logo. Why should all that be junked entirely now? I don't see why the Nolan era should be immune from a reboot itself after all the previous versions. It's important for Batman to change, simply re-doing what Nolan did would be a major mistake. Then they would be criticised for re-hashing instead of simply trying and messing up on their own accord.
I waited 8 long and frustrating years between Batman and Robin and Begins and I don't wanna go through that wilderness again ;D A reboot I hope would come say 4-5 years. Not too long. I'm already hungry for the future. I'd hate seeing a Dark Knight Returns (don't really wanna pay for adapted material I can read at my kitchen table, I want original groundbreaking content) and Batman Beyond? Nope. I never want to see another character replace Bruce Wayne. For me that has never and will never work. You may think Bruce Wayne is tired and done to death but fact is no other Batman would ever be twice as fascinating to see onscreen on in the books.
I recently read my Michael Singer book about the making of Batman Returns in which they hailed Michael Keaton as the definitive Batman for "today's generation". How times change? Keaton is still my number 1 but back then nobody expected what the future would hold for the series. They thought then we had just seen the bestest Batman movie in the universe there will ever be...ever! You may think Nolan's Batman is the pinnacle of all time but just wait and see. Even better adventures may be just ahead in the future if they are done correct and exciting still. And that is very exciting to me.
Quote from: Bobthegoon89 on Thu, 4 Oct 2012, 22:43
I agree with resting Batman certainly (even Chris O' Donnel said this is an important means to the success of the series).
I'm not getting any younger...I want more, now! :D
Well, if Rocksteady goes on with their Batman game franchise, and WB keeps making quality animated films, I'll be fine if the next "proper" Batman film is in 10 years from now. But yeah, we're not getting any younger, LOL.
EDIT: Maybe we need this generation's Animated Series. Couldn't they make a new Batman animated series in the style of movies like Under the Red Hood, Year One etc
Quote from: Bobthegoon89 on Thu, 4 Oct 2012, 22:43To tell you my personal opinion I'm all for this. I'm totally against seeing a new Batman introduced in a Justic League film however.
It's a quick and easy way of reintroducing Batman without spending money on a solo film. I think it's a good approach.
Quote from: Bobthegoon89 on Thu, 4 Oct 2012, 22:43It's a good (ergo bad) means of alienating the fans and viewers of the Dark Knight trilogy to suddenly have this new boy pop up in a team up flick.
This presupposes those fans would be friendly to any non-Nolan incarnation, and I'm not convinced they would be. I think it's more likely that in attempting to appease them, WB would be chasing an audience that wants nothing to do with them. The majority of Nolan fans I know and know about are hardliners. Anything else isn't going to suit them. So why worry about them?
Quote from: Bobthegoon89 on Thu, 4 Oct 2012, 22:43Establish him first, then do a team up (if we really must *sigh*).
Avengers and Marvel in general handily demonstrate that audiences want a shared universe. An immaculate, standalone world made sense at some point but the 80's are over.